Jon
Do you ever feel like people’s ups-and-downs can synchronize with each other? : : Like menstrual cycles? Exactly like that. But sometimes it feels like other body and mind cycles sync too. : : I know what you mean. I think it just…being in sync with the person though. Maybe sometimes it’s just sympathy pains. I can believe that. But maybe sympathy is magical. : : Maybe people are magical. I think we are. Do you? : : I think it takes a spark to initiate the magic we experience in people. Sometimes that spark is in our head; sometimes that’s all we need. You mean like a spark of recognition? Or “sparks flying?” : : Recognition. But that recognition could be anything. So it’s something to do with attention, then? Noticing something? Does that mean everything sparks when we notice it? : : I meant more of a spark on a deeper level I guess. The spark that makes us see the magic in people. It could be subconscious. But it’s there So it happens *to* us, then. Or can we light our own sparks? : : Well, technically I guess it’s happening to us, but that usually has something to do with ourselves, so it’s part you, as well. : This is all just how I see things. I haven’t planned anything out. Do we have a choice sometimes? Or never? Or is the only choice to be ready or not? : : I think of it as something that’s just constantly happening. However, we make the choice for it to be possible by being ourselves. If we’re not being ourselves, it’s not possible to spark. Not to quote a movie, but “how are we not ourselves?” : : I wasn’t insinuating we could not be ourselves. Then we don’t have a choice? : : The sparks are set off by things already in our minds—memories, likes, words—why are these things already in our minds? Because of us? : Because of others? Both? A fucking fantastic question. Things get in there with or without us. We seem to be able to focus our gaze with effort, but that’s it. : She’s @atjamie. See also: Everything is ablaze!
✈ Row 21: Old man, young woman, me — Jon Mitchell (@JonMwords) January 8, 2012
✈ Row 21: @alicianjenkins, now tweeting the incident. — Jon Mitchell (@JonMwords) January 8, 2012
Oh the irony. A 70+ man just leaned over, pointed to my paperback and said, “oh I’m reading that book on my kindle” #behindthetimes — Alicia Jenkins (@aliciaNjenkins) January 8, 2012 Happy new year! When these words hit the Internet, there was one minute left in 2011 on the East Coast of the U.S. By now, we’re past that, even if only by seconds. We’re in that new chapter of the future, and people don’t call the years “two thousand” anymore. It’s “twenty” from here on out. Quicker. Fewer characters. Faster downloads. Yeah, it’s the future, baby. Read more on the official Burning Man Blog. It was the most compelling illusion I’d ever seen in my life. The movie wasn’t any good. Boys in letter jackets, girls with ponytails, drive-thrus, giant cars. Not that I had much to say about chronicity, but their vocabularies were dated. “Golly.” “Swell.” All the while, my mouth was bursting with stars. I was in, all right. Read more on the official Burning Man Blog. It wasn’t until I was halfway through checking out that I realized I’d have to fit three bags of groceries into two in order to walk home, and Fred Meyer paper bags don’t have handles. Everything went fine with one stuffed bag under each arm as I waddled across the parking lot, but my arms were starting to go by the time I reached the public sidewalk. I veered left toward home. The bridge across I-84 stretched out long ahead of me. I noticed that the guardrail was about the right height to rest the bags on and readjust. But as I made my way over, I felt more than heard the bag under my left arm start to rip. It began to settle in that this was going to be an adventure. I started shuffling the stuff around between bags to lighten the load on the ripped one, but it was no good. That bag was finished. So I just tried to wrap up some of the bigger, lighter things in the shreds of the bag and hold it against my body while I carried the intact bag under one arm. I made it about 20 more yards, and then the jar of salsa rolled out of the dying bag and smashed on my shoe. I put everything down. I was halfway home. My only choice was to jam everything into the one remaining bag, but I knew even as I tried that this would be at least a failure if not an outright catastrophe. The ice cream was melting, the spinach container was crushed, I had so many cans of beans and tomato sauce that the paper would surely disintegrate under the weight. I considered places to stash some groceries — in nasty bushes next to the street — so I could hustle home with the rest, turn back, and retrieve my cache. But that was a desperate plan, and I didn’t want to risk the food. Slowly, I began to despair. But then a car pulled into the driveway right behind me and stopped. I heard the parking brake ratchet down. A man with curly black hair stepped out and went to open the trunk. “Do you need a bag?” he said. “My god. Yes,” I stammered. “Thank you. Yes.” He produced one paper bag — a Target one with handles — and one kind of grimy, blue fabric bag that I knew I could over-stuff. “Happy Halloween,” he said, and he handed them to me. My arms throbbing, my fingers fumbling as I repacked the bags, I thanked him again as he got into his car. The phrase “First World problems,” a very hip and self-aware notion the elite like to use to congratulate themselves with a touch of self-deprecation, scrolled through my mind. I watched the man who helped me pull out of the driveway and turn left without looking. I heard the blare of a horn and a screech of brakes. A car skidded to a stop inches from the driver’s-side door protecting my rescuer. He must have been preoccupied thinking about his deed. I watched him peel off. The driver who almost hit him stayed still, stopped in the middle of traffic, for a while. I watched him, trying to see his expression. He must have been shocked. After he drove away, I hoisted my new bags and carried them home. As soon as I put them down on the counter, the paper bag from Target fell apart, but by then I could laugh. I’m starting a professional-ish blog, so you can choose whether you want sanity or madness. Everything is ablaze! is for madness, obviously. Just check the punctuation marks in the names. My new blog is called Afterthoughts. It can be found at blog.jonmitchell.me. By reading these words, you are by no means obligated to follow me over there. That’s where I’ll get all my professional ya-yas out, so the blog you’re on now can remain 100% fun. But just in case you’re still interested, here’s an excerpt from ⌘ The first afterthought.: This will be a venue for one- and two-way conversations about the Internet for people who work on, in, and/or around it. I will write in the first person, but this is by no means a blog about me. It’s the place where I will be most comfortable talking about the so-called tech industry (as if it’s one monolithic thing) in broad, sweeping terms. If that sounds interesting to you, go ahead and follow that blog, too. If you prefer madness, just stay here by all means. And as always, if you follow me on Twitter @JonMwords, you’ll get to the right place eventually. Oh shit. I’d better go to bed. Midnight aboard the Crystal Ship. We jam like the world forgot how to dance, and we’re the only ones who remember the steps. We throw down to show them how again. Like it’s our responsibility. It is. They don’t know how to do it like we do. They have awkward steps. They ain’t got that fractal geometry. They can’t change the colors of their crystals at will like we can. I’m makin that spit face like somebody just puked up a dinosaur bone. CULTURE is a careless description of what’s happening most of the time. When it isn’t intentional, it’s just a pageant of internalized values. When it is a meant gesture, it is a reflection of highest ideals, not true selves. Out here, though, we’ve got something. It’s low (low), it’s base (bass), but it’s beautiful, and we’re all in on the joke while everyone else laughs. Photos 1-3 by Josh Adler, theother1percent.org. Photo 4 by Mischa Steiner. Burning Man is, in some ways, a virtual world. It’s not unlike Second Life: a flat, empty plane onto which creator/participants build a temporary society however they can, making every decision into a work of art. Indeed, Second Life founder Philip Rosedale is a longtime Burner himself, and the Burning Man organization now holds an official event there. But there are also stark differences. Burning Man’s principles emphasize participation, immediacy and face-to-face encounters. Plus, it’s an awfully dusty place to bring your iPad. Burning Man participants refer to the sphere of work, chores, shopping and Web surfing – the things that occupy the other 358 days of the year – as the “default world.” This is my first day back in it, having just returned from my annual rite of passage at the desert festival. As always, the planned disconnection from the Web was an immense relief. When surrounded by such works of human days and hands that deserve complete attention, framed by a vast and serene natural environment, the last thing I want is for a white number in a red box to pop into my field of vision and distract me. PHOTO: Rygg Larsen (cross-posted from the NewsTrust blog) Last year, a mutual friend introduced me to Jon Mitchell, who was looking for advice on how to get into journalism, having recently graduated from Brown University. In a matter of weeks after our call, Jon became one of our most prolific NewsTrust reviewers, rising to the occasion to become our managing editor in July 2010. It has been a true pleasure to work with Jon ever since and I am very grateful for his many thoughtful contributions to NewsTrust. In a single year, he took on more jobs than some people get in an entire career, from hosting news hunts to fact-checking politicians, managing online communities, teaching journalism students and promoting our findings on social networks. I am sorry to see him go, but am also rooting for him in his new role as a writer for ReadWriteWeb. For this exit report, I asked Jon to share his personal observations from his experience at NewsTrust, and reflect on how social news sites like ours can encourage more people to grow their news literacy skills. Thank you, Jon, for all your wonderful insights and good luck with your next steps as a journalist! – Fabrice Florin After a year and a half of playing around with it, I’m more sure than ever that NewsTrust is the right tool for the job. As the person responsible for curating the day-to-day NewsTrust experience, the amazing array of features and options was occasionally dazzling, even to me. But I’ve been away from it for a month or so, having started as a full-time writer at ReadWriteWeb, whose warm review of NewsTrust was among my first impressions of it, and it’s a joy to look at this homepage from an ordinary user’s perspective again. The homepage is well-organized, rich with content, easy to share, and filled with friendly faces of members. I can hardly imagine a better example of a civic-minded social news network. The trouble is, the idea of the Web is shifting under our feet. In 2006, when NewsTrust opened, there was no iPhone. Facebook had barely begun to reach the general public. The word “app” scarcely existed to describe what NewsTrust is: a Web app for filtering the news. And the NewsTrust application is powerful. It has enabled this small team to attain some lofty goals. But many more Web apps have sprung up over the last five years, some of them growing at gargantuan scale, and the great ones offer rich content and warm community, too. They also offer tantalizing games, titillating gossip, and videos of cats. We can only spend so much daily time and energy on the Web, and though we may spend quite a lot, there’s always more stuff out there. Herbert Simon described the Information Age as an “attention economy.” NewsTrust requires careful attention. It’s not always fun, at least not in the way other social networks have defined fun. Separating fact from fiction in the news is a tough job, but, if we want a healthy civic society, somebody’s got to do it. As we decided this summer, NewsTrust is shifting from a standalone news curation site into a consultancy to help larger partners better inform and engage their communities. The idea of crowd-sourcing quality control over the news was a noble one, and I don’t mean that it was unrealistic; it just requires a really big crowd. Our email newsletters go out to about 12,000 people, and that drives a good amount of traffic to the site, but there are too many alternatives now. In this heyday of the social Web, a few websites hold sway over most of the crowd, and it’s usually the ones with the cat videos. NewsTrust has kept up with social media all along, with deep Facebook and Twitter integration practically everywhere, but just sharing stories is no longer enough. All news sites have sharing options, usually too many of them. It’s expected. NewsTrust demands more than just reading; it asks for analysis, reflection, and reviews. NewsTrust has to do more to get people to go through that effort. Its next challenge is to take this practice beyond the confines of this complex website with its high learning curve and bring the ongoing conversation along with it. The best part about NewsTrust is the conversation. The hierarchy of trust on the site produces such high-caliber discussion for a Web forum; it never ceased to amaze me. Fabrice frequently calls it “a clean, well-lighted space,” contrasting it with the dingy basements that comments sections so often become on large news sites. NewsTrust’s insistence on transparency and disclosure helps ensure mutual respect, although it isn’t a community model that works for everyone. Other social networks, like Facebook and Google+, have chosen a similar approach to pseudonymity. That has proven a controversial choice, because these social networking sites are vying to become the root location of Web users’ identities, and many people don’t want their Web identities to be public. But NewsTrust needs a more particular kind of community. It doesn’t need everyone on the Web to make it work. A dedicated few can add great value for the benefit of many more. Those who are willing to stand up and be counted in the effort to improve the quality of news and information can bear the standard for their fellow citizens. I’m excited for the future of Truthsquad, the pro-am fact-checking services we created last year. The first pilots have shown that bringing questionable claims to the attention of many will inspire a few to dig for the truth. The compelling part about Truthsquad is that it offers information that’s useful at a quick glance, a one-word assessment of the truth or falsehood of a statement, but it’s also open to much deeper exploration of an issue. If NewsTrust is to add value to news stories encountered out on the open Web, rather than in the well-defined constraints of one site, making bite-sized statements about the content will make it more digestible. I think NewsTrust’s educational applications have shown great promise. The tools are flexible enough to custom-build solutions on a case-by-case basis, whether for teaching journalism skills or courses on a particular topic in the news. Check out my report on our 2010 educational programs for more specifics. I also couldn’t be more proud of the NewsTrust Baltimore team and the amazing work they pulled off using NewsTrust tools at a local scale. The reports alone offer a wealth of information about Baltimore’s local news ecosystem that didn’t exist in one place before. Whatever new applications are found for NewsTrust’s tools and methods, I know they will make for a better Web. Fabrice loves to sign his emails with that superhero-like exclamation: “Onward!” It’s inspiring to work under that kind of enthusiastic guidance. I can’t even begin to thank Fabrice for the opportunity he gave me to work on the NewsTrust project (believe me; I’ve tried a few times). When I started here, all I had was potential and enthusiasm. Fabrice entrusted me with a title and a range of roles way beyond my years, and it was only due to his patient guidance that I was able to fill them. I hope he’s as proud of the work we did together as I am. And to Kaizar Campwala, NewsTrust’s previous editor, who saw enough potential in me to leave the reins in my hands, I owe a great deal. I’m eagerly watching his new endeavors, and seeing what he built here at NewsTrust, I know his work is going to rock the world. To Subbu Sastry, most patient of engineers, I can’t believe what you accomplish every day. Though I learned from everyone with whom I worked here, I certainly learned the most from you. Honestly, if I have any sort of career in what my fellow bloggers call “Tech,” I have you to thank. Talking to you about the systems, databases, and languages that make NewsTrust hum along so smoothly was really what inspired me to keep building on the platform every day. And I’ll never forget the day Amazon EC2 crapped out on us, and how you single-handedly flipped us over to their beta program for moving regions, bringing NewsTrust back online faster than so many other headline-grabbing Web services. And you saved the day many more times than that. To Gin, Mary, and Andrew, the NTBmore team, again in no order other than that in which I met you, it was such an honor. You people are so skilled. It has been a joy seeing what each of you has started to get into in your lives after NewsTrust, and I’ll definitely be keeping track. Someday, I’d love for us all to work together on something again. Seriously. Call me. And to the NewsTrust community, whose reviews I’ve read, whose posts I’ve tagged, whose validation levels I’ve increased, whose comments I’ve liked, you people are what it’s all about. All Web communities should have what we’ve had. We haven’t been free of interpersonal issues or strife — every community has those — but we’ve had such a strong basis for working it out amongst ourselves, and that is rare on the Web. I hope you’ll stick with NewsTrust wherever it goes, and, more importantly, I hope you’ll carry on the lessons of fairness, accuracy, and transparency we’ve all practiced together. I know I will. See you around the Web. - Jon
Filed under: Life, The Future | Tags: America, generations, information age, The Media, zeitgeist
M: “That’s what I’m reading on my Kindle!”
YW: “Oh really? Where you at?
OM: “86%!”
J: “Ah, the future.”
J: “Are you doing what I just did?”
A: “Yep!
“J: “They write themselves sometimes.”
Filed under: ¡Eia!
Filed under: Burning Man, Internet | Tags: art, Burning Man, information age, social media, zeitgeist
Well, the Hippie High Holidays are finally here. You won’t be hearing a peep from me for the next 10 or so days, because it’s time for me to go home to Burning Man.
For those playing along from your default homes, you can live vicariously by reading my Burning Man archives and looking at all the pretty pictures. For those of you coming to the party, I cannot wait to see you.
When I get back, I’m going to write about it. You’ll hear about it here on ¡Eia!, but something rather different is coming. I’m not going to say much for now, but I’ll give you a sneak peak:
That’s a hand-carved stamp by my dear friend Anna Kimmell, by the way. You should scope out the Stamps by Anna Facebook page and see what other amazing stamps she’s made. She also takes requests.
Anyhow, catch you on the flip side. Bring your reading goggles.
Filed under: ¡Eia!, Internet | Tags: Facebook, Google, information age, journalism, NewsTrust, social media, The Media, Twitter
Shifting gears
Transparency and identity
Future applications
Onward!
-
face/name:
Subscribe to ¡Eia!
-
Sparks
2 Comments
✈ Row 21
January 10, 2012, 9:09 am
Happy New Year
Night At The Bijou
First World problems.
Afterthoughts.
September 18, 2011, 3:06 am
Aboard the Crystal Ship
I’m going home
